Wednesday, June 28, 2017

I think I might have cornered that dungeon procedure.


I think I might have cornered that dungeon procedure.

Jerome Larre​, let's playtest this!

15 comments:

  1. Lad Rilia (ça l'intéressera aussi).
    Par contre, j'ai un peu du mal à lire le texte. Mais partant quoi qu'il en soit pour tester !

    ReplyDelete
  2. C'est MJ-facing, t'inquiète :)
    (J'avais oublié le pseudo, je cherchais sous ton nom, Lad Rilia​...)

    ReplyDelete
  3. I like how you build the dungeon and then reference the rooms for the wandering monster roll. At first I was really confused because I make my dungeons in-game as opposed to beforehand.

    ReplyDelete
  4. How very un-old school of you, Chris Stieha​! :P
    I don't think this template would be of use for dungeon improv. It's be interesting to try and tweak though.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I'm prepping my MM sandbox (and I need to create some dungeons) so I'm interested to see how your procedure works.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Jean-Marc CHOSEROT I should be testing it on Monday, but maybe I'll share what I have before that...

    ReplyDelete
  7. I probably will not be available on Monday. Keep me in the loop nonetheless.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Jean-Marc CHOSEROT It's an IRL game anyway. You're not close to Toulouse are you?

    ReplyDelete
  9. 537km ... don't know how many hexs that makes ;-)
    Play well !

    ReplyDelete
  10. Eric Nieudan I could see the random encounter table containing monsters and encounters as well as containing references to previous encounters.
    For example:
    1) d6 squidworms
    2) d8 hiccupotami
    3) d10 birds of a feather
    ...
    7) Roll a dice equal to the number of encounters that have occurred. Build off that encounter.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Chris Stieha​ Hmmm, I don't know. I'd like the procedure to be as simple as possible. It isn't to say that the referee can't improvise while running. I'll see how it works at the table but I'm thinking the mix of static and random encounters will develop its own dynamic.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Oh, I wasn't suggesting that you try this at the table. I was thinking about modifying your procedure for me ;)

    ReplyDelete
  13. Chris Stieha Then I'm interested in what you come up with!

    ReplyDelete